East Asian scripts / Korean
Korean text in a PDF
Hangul syllables exist in two forms in Unicode, precomposed and assembled from parts, and a font can support one and not the other.
A font with the characters is not enough
A Hangul syllable such as the one for han can be a single precomposed code point, of which there are 11,172, or it can be a sequence of jamo, the individual consonant and vowel letters, which the renderer composes into a syllable block. Normalisation decides which you have: NFC produces precomposed syllables and NFD decomposes them into jamo. Fonts overwhelmingly support the precomposed forms and support jamo composition unevenly, so text that arrives in NFD from a system that normalised it, which macOS filesystems historically did, renders as a row of separated letter shapes instead of syllable blocks. Korean also differs from Chinese and Japanese in having word spaces, so its line breaking is closer to Latin than to its neighbours.
What the failure looks like
Syllables that have fallen apart into their component letters, sitting side by side at full width instead of stacked into a block. It is unmistakable once seen and it is invisible in a database, because the string is correct and only its normalisation form differs.
Line breaking
Korean uses spaces between words, so breaking works like Latin rather than like Chinese. The engine may still break between syllables where a word is too long for the line, which is acceptable in Korean typography and surprises people who expect Latin word-breaking behaviour.
The markup and the CSS
The language attribute is doing real typographic work in every one of these examples. It is what lets the engine choose a regional glyph form, a case mapping or a hyphenation dictionary, and leaving it off is the most common single omission in a multilingual document.
<p lang="ko" class="korean">청구서가 준비되었습니다.</p>
<style>
@font-face {
font-family: "Noto Sans KR";
src: url("https://assets.example.com/fonts/noto-sans-kr.woff2")
format("woff2");
}
.korean {
font-family: "Noto Sans KR", sans-serif;
line-height: 1.7;
/* Korean has word spaces, so ordinary word breaking applies, unlike
the Chinese and Japanese cases. */
word-break: keep-all;
overflow-wrap: break-word;
}</style>
<!-- Normalise to NFC on the way in. Text that arrives decomposed will
render as separated jamo in most fonts:
const text = raw.normalize("NFC"); -->The mistake people make
Setting word-break: break-all on a container to stop long strings overflowing, and applying it to Korean. Korean has word spaces and break-all ignores them, so words break mid-syllable at arbitrary points. Use keep-all with overflow-wrap for Korean, which respects word boundaries and still prevents overflow.
How to test this without reading the language
Render a string you know is correct, and compare it against a reference rendering from a system that definitely handles the script, such as a browser on a machine with the language installed. Comparing against nothing tells you only that characters appeared, and for most of the scripts on this site characters appearing is not the same as text being right. Where you can, get one native reader to look at one page once; it is faster than any amount of specification reading.
Frequently asked
Why does Korean look wrong when every character is there?
Syllables that have fallen apart into their component letters, sitting side by side at full width instead of stacked into a block. It is unmistakable once seen and it is invisible in a database, because the string is correct and only its normalisation form differs. The underlying reason is that a font is two things: a set of glyphs and a set of layout tables that say how those glyphs combine and position. Character coverage is the first half. Most of the failures on this page are the second half.
Does the lang attribute actually change the rendering?
Yes, and it is not an accessibility nicety here. It selects regional glyph forms where a code point has more than one correct shape, it picks the case mapping for a text transform, it chooses a hyphenation dictionary, and it triggers the locl OpenType feature. A document with no lang attribute gets whatever the font defaults to, which is usually right for one language and wrong for the others.
Can I subset the font to keep the file small?
Carefully, and not with a tool configured for Latin. Subsetters routinely drop the GSUB and GPOS tables that shape and position glyphs, because for Latin those are largely optional. The subset renders without error and every complex feature in it is broken. Test a subset by rendering real text and looking at it, never by checking that the file got smaller.
Related writing systems
Scripts with a related mechanism, and one from each of the other families.
Japanese text in a PDF
Japanese shares code points with Chinese while wanting different glyph shapes for them, and has line-breaking rules that no default implements.
Chinese text in a PDF
Simplified and Traditional are different character sets rather than different fonts, and a face covering one may genuinely not contain the other.
Devanagari text in a PDF
Hindi, Marathi, Nepali and Sanskrit are written in a script where the order characters are stored in is not the order they are drawn in.
Thai text in a PDF
Thai is written without spaces between words and stacks marks up to three levels above the baseline, so both line breaking and line height need deciding rather than defaulting.
Vietnamese text in a PDF
Vietnamese is Latin with two diacritics stacked on one letter, and most Latin fonts contain the characters while positioning the second mark badly or not at all.
Cyrillic text in a PDF
Most Latin fonts include some Cyrillic, usually the Russian subset, and several languages written in Cyrillic need letters or letter shapes that subset does not have.
CJK characters showing as boxes
The adjacent problem, covered in full there rather than repeated here.
Every writing system covered
The nine that needed a page, and the eight existing pages that cover the rest.
Paste a real string in this script into the playground and compare the output against a reference. It is the only test that means anything if you do not read the language.